Comments for Paroxysms of Sketch - Website of Heini Reinert http://sketchsepahi.com Website of Heini Reinert Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:28:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Spacetime Worms by Sketch Sepahi http://sketchsepahi.com/blog/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-9074 Sketch Sepahi Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:28:22 +0000 http://sketchsepahi.com/?p=379#comment-9074 I hope you're not expecting an answer... I hope you’re not expecting an answer…

]]> Comment on Spacetime Worms by infinitely small http://sketchsepahi.com/blog/archives/379/comment-page-1#comment-8810 infinitely small Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:53:34 +0000 http://sketchsepahi.com/?p=379#comment-8810 Our universe can be said to be infinitely large whilst the microscopic world is infinitely tiny. But just what is infinitely large and tiny in truly mathematical terms? Our universe can be said to be infinitely large whilst the microscopic world is infinitely tiny. But just what is infinitely large and tiny in truly mathematical terms?

]]> Comment on Interview with Robin LePoidevin by Rúni Schneekloth http://sketchsepahi.com/blog/archives/1309/comment-page-1#comment-8295 Rúni Schneekloth Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:28:48 +0000 http://sketchsepahi.com/?p=1309#comment-8295 Hatta argumenti ímóti guds eksistensi við støði í tíðsbegrebinum var nokso áhugavert. Temporalitetur er ein fullkomiligani grundleggjandi eksistenstreyt fyri menniskja. Vit verða fødd, vit liva, og vit doyggja. Vit hava mál, vónir fyri framtíðina og vit handla; alt við endaligari tíð sum grundtreyt. Samstundis verður guð karakteriseraður sum tað ideella menniskja (Anscomb); men hann er uttan fyri tíðina, og er ikki temporalt tengdur. ella soleiðis skilti eg tað... Hatta argumenti ímóti guds eksistensi við støði í tíðsbegrebinum var nokso áhugavert. Temporalitetur er ein fullkomiligani grundleggjandi eksistenstreyt fyri menniskja. Vit verða fødd, vit liva, og vit doyggja. Vit hava mál, vónir fyri framtíðina og vit handla; alt við endaligari tíð sum grundtreyt. Samstundis verður guð karakteriseraður sum tað ideella menniskja (Anscomb); men hann er uttan fyri tíðina, og er ikki temporalt tengdur.

ella soleiðis skilti eg tað…

]]> Comment on Plantinga’s Naturalism Defeater by Sketch Sepahi http://sketchsepahi.com/blog/archives/1368/comment-page-1#comment-7687 Sketch Sepahi Fri, 14 Oct 2011 21:10:33 +0000 http://sketchsepahi.com/?p=1368#comment-7687 Thank you kindly for your comment, Arni. Although I must confess I'm not entirely sure how ontological arguments are relevant. Probably just me. Thank you kindly for your comment, Arni. Although I must confess I’m not entirely sure how ontological arguments are relevant. Probably just me.

]]> Comment on Plantinga’s Naturalism Defeater by Arni Zachariassen http://sketchsepahi.com/blog/archives/1368/comment-page-1#comment-7677 Arni Zachariassen Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:34:05 +0000 http://sketchsepahi.com/?p=1368#comment-7677 That's a really interesting argument. I agree - too bad they didn't pursue it. It's almost like the ontological argument turned on its head: It's not that God must exist because he is conceivable (to simplify the argument insanely), but he cannot exist because his non-existence is conceivable. Pretty cool. That’s a really interesting argument. I agree – too bad they didn’t pursue it. It’s almost like the ontological argument turned on its head: It’s not that God must exist because he is conceivable (to simplify the argument insanely), but he cannot exist because his non-existence is conceivable. Pretty cool.

]]> Comment on Plantinga’s Naturalism Defeater by Sketch Sepahi http://sketchsepahi.com/blog/archives/1368/comment-page-1#comment-7647 Sketch Sepahi Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:48:08 +0000 http://sketchsepahi.com/?p=1368#comment-7647 I suspect tendency is just likelihood. So Paul has a tendency to promote humanism = The likelihood that Paul will promote humanism is at least greater than not. I might be wrong though. I suspect tendency is just likelihood. So Paul has a tendency to promote humanism = The likelihood that Paul will promote humanism is at least greater than not. I might be wrong though.

]]> Comment on Plantinga’s Naturalism Defeater by Sketch Sepahi http://sketchsepahi.com/blog/archives/1368/comment-page-1#comment-7646 Sketch Sepahi Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:45:15 +0000 http://sketchsepahi.com/?p=1368#comment-7646 Hahaha! That just about sums it up, yeah. Hahaha! That just about sums it up, yeah.

]]> Comment on Plantinga’s Naturalism Defeater by Magni Joensen http://sketchsepahi.com/blog/archives/1368/comment-page-1#comment-7644 Magni Joensen Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:33:22 +0000 http://sketchsepahi.com/?p=1368#comment-7644 so... Al and Steve had an argument.. and they never reached a conclusion? so... Sketch and his disco GF came to a conclusion instead of them? right? so… Al and Steve had an argument.. and they never reached a conclusion?
so… Sketch and his disco GF came to a conclusion instead of them?
right?

]]> Comment on Plantinga’s Naturalism Defeater by paul http://sketchsepahi.com/blog/archives/1368/comment-page-1#comment-7642 paul Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:10:17 +0000 http://sketchsepahi.com/?p=1368#comment-7642 non-tech. comment. You are clear , but vast % of people are NOT LOGICAL . The biases are unconscious, how define ' tendency ' ? - tend to................... guess ?.... ignore ?..... .......rush?............ random response ? non-tech. comment.
You are clear , but vast % of people are NOT
LOGICAL .
The biases are unconscious,
how define ‘ tendency ‘ ?
- tend to………………. guess ?…. ignore ?…..
…….rush?………… random response ?

]]> Comment on Omniscience Entails Fatalism by Foxtrot Goes Deeper « Paroxysms of Sketch – Website of Heini Reinert http://sketchsepahi.com/blog/archives/1181/comment-page-1#comment-7508 Foxtrot Goes Deeper « Paroxysms of Sketch – Website of Heini Reinert Wed, 28 Sep 2011 13:34:45 +0000 http://sketchsepahi.com/?p=1181#comment-7508 [...] Omniscience entails fatalism. [...] [...] Omniscience entails fatalism. [...]

]]>